Remove Comparison Remove Latency Remove Metrics
article thumbnail

Performance and Scalability Analysis of Redis and Memcached

DZone

This article takes a plunge into the comparative analysis of these two cult technologies, highlights the critical performance metrics concerning scalability considerations, and, through real-world use cases, gives you the clarity to confidently make an informed decision. However, the question arises of choosing the best one.

article thumbnail

Migrating Critical Traffic At Scale with No Downtime?—?Part 1

The Netflix TechBlog

The second phase involves migrating the traffic over to the new systems in a manner that mitigates the risk of incidents while continually monitoring and confirming that we are meeting crucial metrics tracked at multiple levels. It provides a good read on the availability and latency ranges under different production conditions.

Traffic 347
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Implementing service-level objectives to improve software quality

Dynatrace

By implementing service-level objectives, teams can avoid collecting and checking a huge amount of metrics for each service. According to Google’s SRE handbook , best practices, there are “ Four Golden Signals ” we can convert into four SLOs for services: reliability, latency, availability, and saturation.

Software 286
article thumbnail

Dynatrace accelerates business transformation with new AI observability solution

Dynatrace

Bringing together metrics, logs, traces, problem analytics, and root-cause information in dashboards and notebooks, Dynatrace offers an end-to-end unified operational view of cloud applications. To observe model drift and accuracy, companies can use holdout evaluation sets for comparison to model data.

Cache 226
article thumbnail

Investigation of a Workbench UI Latency Issue

The Netflix TechBlog

Using this approach, we observed latencies ranging from 1 to 10 seconds, averaging 7.4 Blame The Notebook Now that we have an objective metric for the slowness, let’s officially start our investigation. In comparison, the terminal handler used only 0.47% CPU time. We then exported the .har

Latency 207
article thumbnail

The Fastest Google Fonts

CSS Wizardry

For each test, I captured the following metrics: First Paint (FP): To what extent is the critical path affected? I’m happy to say, for the metrics that matter the most, we are 700–1,200ms faster. Visually complete was 200ms faster , but any first- metrics were untouched. On a high-latency connection, this spells bad news.

Google 363
article thumbnail

Towards a Unified Theory of Web Performance

Alex Russell

The metrics that we report against implicitly cleave these into different "camps", leaving us thinking about pre- and post-load as distinct universes. The chief effect of the architectural difference is to shift the distribution of latency within the loop. Improving latency for one scenario can degrade it in another.