Remove Benchmarking Remove Code Remove Latency Remove Storage
article thumbnail

Crucial Redis Monitoring Metrics You Must Watch

Scalegrid

Key Takeaways Critical performance indicators such as latency, CPU usage, memory utilization, hit rate, and number of connected clients/slaves/evictions must be monitored to maintain Redis’s high throughput and low latency capabilities. It can achieve impressive performance, handling up to 50 million operations per second.

Metrics 130
article thumbnail

Five Data-Loading Patterns To Improve Frontend Performance

Smashing Magazine

Every unnecessary bit of JavaScript code you bundle and serve will be more code the client has to load and process. On your first try, you can use it as a benchmark for optimizations later. How will you serve blazingly fast code, then? Caching partially stores your data and is not used as permanent storage.

Cache 126
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Redis vs Memcached in 2024

Scalegrid

This article will explore how they handle data storage and scalability, perform in different scenarios, and, most importantly, how these factors influence your choice. It uses a hash table to manage these pairs, divided into fixed-size buckets with linked lists for key-value storage. Redis Database Management with ScaleGrid ScaleGrid.io

Cache 130
article thumbnail

RPC vs. Messaging – which is faster?

Particular Software

Some will claim that any type of RPC communication ends up being faster (meaning it has lower latency) than any equivalent invocation using asynchronous messaging. If you did such a benchmark, here’s an incomplete picture you might end up with: Graph of microbenchmark showing RPC is faster than messaging.

article thumbnail

Virtual consensus in Delos

The Morning Paper

The initial version of Delos went into production after eight months using a ZooKeeper-backed Loglet implementation, and then four months later it was swapped out for a new custom-built NativeLoglet that gave a 10x improvement in end-to-end latency. replacing Paxos with Raft), or they could be shims over external storage systems.

article thumbnail

WAL Compression in PostgreSQL and Recent Improvements in Version 15

Percona

This will be clearly visible in PostgreSQL performance benchmarks as a “ Sawtooth wave ” pattern observed by Vadim in his tests: As we can see, the throughput suddenly drops after every checkpoint due to heavy WAL writing and gradually picks up until the next checkpoint. But this comes with a considerable performance implication.

Database 119
article thumbnail

Aurora vs RDS: How to Choose the Right AWS Database Solution

Percona

It efficiently manages read and write operations, optimizes data access, and minimizes contention, resulting in high throughput and low latency to ensure that applications perform at their best. While RDS MySQL supports multiple storage engines with varying capabilities, not all of them are optimized for crash recovery and data durability.

AWS 52