Remove Benchmarking Remove Definition Remove Hardware Remove Network
article thumbnail

Kubernetes for Big Data Workloads

Abhishek Tiwari

optimised container networking and security. A recent performance benchmark completed by Intel and BlueData using the BigBench benchmarking kit has shown that the performance ratios for container-based Hadoop workloads on BlueData EPIC are equal to and in some cases, better than bare-metal Hadoop [7]. Performance.

article thumbnail

Upcoming of the learned data structures

Abhishek Tiwari

More importantly, if this works out well, this could lead to a radical improvement in performance by leveraging hardware trends such as GPUs and TPUs. The benchmarking was performed using 3 real-world data sets (weblogs, maps, and web-documents), and 1 synthetic dataset (lognormal). Learned indexes. Learned Bloom filters. What's next.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Ten years of page bloat: What have we learned?

Speed Curve

But pages keep getting bigger and more complex year over year – and this increasing size and complexity is not fully mitigated by faster devices and networks, or by our hard-working browsers. Having said that, looking at data over the past ten years, it's safe to make the observation that pages are definitely trending bigger.

Mobile 145
article thumbnail

What programming languages does HammerDB use and why does it matter?

HammerDB

HammerDB is a load testing and benchmarking application for relational databases. However, it is crucial that the benchmarking application does not have inherent bottlenecks that artificially limits the scalability of the database. Basic Benchmarking Concepts. To benchmark a database we introduce the concept of a Virtual User.

article thumbnail

The Performance Inequality Gap, 2024

Alex Russell

It's time once again to update our priors regarding the global device and network situation. HTML, CSS, images, and fonts can all be parsed and run at near wire speeds on low-end hardware, but JavaScript is at least three times more expensive, byte-for-byte. What's changed since last year? and 75KiB of JavaScript.

article thumbnail

The Performance Inequality Gap, 2021

Alex Russell

Thanks to progress in networks and browsers (but not devices), a more generous global budget cap has emerged for sites constructed the "modern" way: ~100KiB of HTML/CSS/fonts and ~300-350KiB of JS (compressed) is the new rule-of-thumb limit for at least the next year or two. Modern network performance and availability.

article thumbnail

Can You Afford It?: Real-world Web Performance Budgets

Alex Russell

We constrain ourselves to a real-world baseline device + network configuration to measure progress. Budgets are scaled to a benchmark network & device. JavaScript is the single most expensive part of any page in ways that are a function of both network capacity and device speed. The median user is on a slow network.