Remove 2016 Remove Benchmarking Remove Database Remove Technology
article thumbnail

Performance Testing at MongoDB

Alex Podelko

One of main reasons I joined MongoDB recently was my excitement about the technology. Evergreen Continuous Integration: Why We Reinvented The Wheel , blog post from July 27, 2016, explains why and how it was done. As it was already described in detail by my colleagues, no need for me to write about it – I can just list references.

article thumbnail

SQL Server 2016 – It Just Runs Faster: Always On Availability Groups Turbocharged

SQL Server According to Bob

The rapid acceleration in technology brought on a new discovery and paradigm. The result is a design for SQL Server 2016 that provides high availability for the most demanding workloads on the latest hardware with minimal impact and scalable for the future. Direct seeding of new database replicas. one without a replica).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The Performance Inequality Gap, 2021

Alex Russell

Back in 2016, I gave a talk outlining the causes and effects of the terrible performance of web apps built using popular tools on the fastest-growing device segment: low-end to mid-range Android phones. In 2016, Jio swept over the subcontinent like a monsoon dropping a torrent of 4G infrastructure and free data rather than rain.

article thumbnail

Is Intel Doomed in the Server CPU Space?

SQL Performance

If you have been paying attention to the technology press over the past 12-18 months, you may have noticed a rather large number of negative stories about Intel's processor business. This made it easier for database professionals to make the case for a hardware upgrade, and made the typical upgrade more worthwhile.

Servers 46
article thumbnail

A Management Maturity Model for Performance

Alex Russell

Panglossian nonsense. --> Organisations that serve their tools tread water no matter how advanced their technology, while groups that intentionally manage systems can succeed on any stack. [1]. Teams that achieve Level 4 maturity are cautious acquirers of technology. Value Propositions #. What's the problem? Management Attributes #.